Evaluation of the Joint Plan 1,1 THE JOINT PLAN OF ACTION 1. Was communicated on time to your organization / association: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 2. Reflects the needs of your organization / association: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 3. Is well documented and self-explanatory, easy to understand and to adopt: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 4. Was well received and presented in your organization / association: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 5. Was well implemented by the Europe Committee WAGGGS and the European Scout Committee: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 6. Includes all the aspects that concern the development of Guiding and Scouting in Europe: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 7. Meets the expectations of your organization / association: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 8. Had a positive impact on your organization / association: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 9. Is expected to have a continuation in the next triennium: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor 10. Is, overall, assessed to be successful: Very Good Good Acceptable Poor PLEASE WRITE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING: 1. How the communication of the Joint Plan of Action and it's implementation are impacting on your Association? 2. Which important elements are missing from the Joint Plan of Action that you believe are vital to be included in it? 3. Which negative aspects do you find in the Joint Work of the Region and especially in the content and the implementation of the Joint Plan of Action? 4. Which positive aspects of the Joint Plan of Action should remain in the next triennium and be further enhanced? 5. Please give your general comments and assessment on the Joint Plan of Action: * The survey has been filled on behalf of the National Scout Association / Member Organization: Powered by CreateSurvey